Federal Judge Panel blocked the Luiisiana program to send a Ten Commandments across the public school class. Many of the teachers of freedom – independence must be important for the first amendment. It also serves as a reminder that public schools should be included in all students, not just those from great faith.
We first covered the issue in June 71 – The first Royal Law in 71 – the first law in the country to authorize the Ten Commandments in the classroom showing all public classes. At that time, I described the Law as a religious operation associated as an education policy. In another year, the Society’s courts have prevented as an inconsistent with the Constitution.
What the court does not mean their decision – and why is it important
The Fifth Regional Court ruled that Louisiana’s law requires the Ten Commandments across the public school class violating the Constitution of the Constitution of Church and the State. While resisting the exhibitions that serve the “court of history”, the court of the history “, the claim was that were not that it was that it was. It was that it was that it was for you that was that it was that it was not that it wasn’t of this country.
The decision follows a long-term legal example. In 1980, the US Supreme Court attacked the same Kentucky law, the decision that there was no valid nationalistic purpose. In 2005, the Court also ruled that the Ten Commandments appeared – this time at this time in Kentucky Courtouse. Courts have changed consistently that public schools cannot promote a religious text, even if they are most important in history.
What does this mean for the teacher
Of the teachers, the meaning of this decision goes far from the legal distance. Teachers make up classes including and accept all students, regardless of their background or beliefs. Displaying “not to other gods in front of me” public schools in the dangers of infringement not by promoting Christianity but by promoting any religion.
The case also worked more than Louisiana. Legal Workers in Texas, Arkansas, and Oklahoma present the same law, signing a comprehensive Christian teaching in public education.
What Our Experts Say
We talked to a few educational experts about what the decision meant by teacher. Dr Jonathan Becker, a school professor of school, says the 5th provision of the 5th province is accompanied by successive decades. “The Supreme Court has already been ruled in 1980 what you need to say that the Ten Commandments in Schools break the Act – and Nothing has been officially changed since then.” He also raised a controversy: “If parents can come out of religious situations + to the reasons for religious, schools can compare non-Christian students to stay under Bible verses and are corrupt?”
Historian Histor adds, “Ten Commandments are never deeply placed in community schools such as other ways – but in any way, you cannot use schools to pressure religion on children.”
Fact: Teachers should not be expected to improve religion in the classroom. That is not just a bad habit – not in the law.
What happens next
This decision marks an important moment, not only legally, but also important values Many teachers work to grow. Classes are intended to be involved all students, regardless of faith or background, feel welcome. When the State gives the use of religious texts, the installation message is difficult to keep. In the meantime, the court’s decision provides a confirmation that public schools should maintain a neutral stand against religion.
That means, the war of law does not last. The General General General General General General General General General Genural General Sitting the complaint, while the emperor emphasizes the Ten Commandments is the basis of the United States. But it is constitution – not any text of one religious – that government teachers are sworn to support.
Teachers should prepare for the ongoing efforts of religion in curriculum and school policies. Staying informed, community building, and funding all students will continue to be important. As these issues continue, one thing is clear: Classes should be the learning areas, not religious or political areas. The readers of the readers are notified, respectful residents should not require legal degree, but require a deep commitment to equity, technology and initial amendment. Our students – and our professional responsibilities – no interpretation.