ESilicon Valley ethnic groups are more powerful, public opinion on the Atlantic, the CEO Tech influence when it comes to the management of the sector, most Britons are concerned about the safety of new AI programs.
Excuse, highlighted in the new-packed poll repeals, come as international leaders and technical administrators, from the USMAN’s Narendra Mode on the SAM SAM SAM SAMI and Google next week to discuss the speedy development of the Ai.
New voting indicates that 87% of Brits will return the law you need to search for AIs that are looking for AIs before issuing, the “smart AI models. discussing the Regulation of AI. The survey was conducted by the British Polletter on the name of the Control Ai, a non-profit-based profits focused on Ai.
Results prove the growing public concern about the development of AI systems that are not compatible or out of many jobs. Such technology is not right now, but creating is the visual purpose of AI such as Openai, Google, Anthropic, Metela, Facebook and Instagrat. In fact, the top CEOs of Tech Tech expects that the systems are actually in case of years, if soon. It is contrary to this in the back of the 75% of the votes that you were voted by YouGov that he should clearly deny the development of AI systems that can escape their locations. In addition half (63%) agreed with the idea of ​​preventing the construction of AI programs that can make them skillfully or stronger.
The British poll launching molds the results of the recent US study, and identifies the growing gap between public views and performing control action when it comes to an advanced AI. Even AI European Union Act of AI – has been seen as a very full AI law and the first to enter this month – you stop in a line facing many Ai programs.
Britain, where the Yougov survey of 2, 3,374. Its growing the hard economy. In January, for example, British premier Keric Starmmer announced that AI would be “organized” in the country’s “veins” to grow – a clear appearance from the regulation.
“It seems that they broke down their promises yet, so that they would attract the bright development,” said Andrea Miormi, the Chief Ai. “But something, the British community is very clear about what they want. They want these promises to be met.”
Fresh stress for new rules
Voting was in line with the 16 law makers from large political parties, which cost the government to present new AI targets to “Superininilligent” Ai Systems, or those that can be more expensive than people.
“Special AIS – such as those scientific and medical – increasing growing growth, performing new things and public works. Superourubligent Ai program can be [by contrast] Qite national and earthquake, “the statement can protect the benefits and postponish AI risks by bringing their promise to the most powerful law of AI.”
MIOTTI, from Lalitwe Ai, says the UK does not need to provide growth by setting the most common regulations such as those contained at EU AI AII AII AII AII AII AII AII AII AII AII AII. Indeed, many in the industry blamed AIs and other EU laws sweeps in the depths of the European technology. Instead, Mighi disputes, the UK could place “slow, intended, which is sent by AI” legislation to the most powerful models that reflect what you see.
“The public requirements are programs that they help, not the systems they replace,” Moighti said. “We should not pursue [superintelligent systems] We even know how safe they are. “
Voting data also indicates that most (74%) Supporting the Secret The Party before the final election to include Ek’s UK’s Ai Security Institute (AIs), enabling acting as a regulator. Currently, AIs – UK government army – carrying exams in private AI models before release, but has no authority to enforce technology