The Bombay High Court on Wednesday rejected the bail plea filed by the father of the minor accused in the Pune Porsche accident case, who was allegedly in the car that killed two cyclists in May this year.
The court revealed that the ingredients of these cases when he first appeared, came from his father who allegedly changed the blood samples of his youngest son who is also a defendant in this case.
The bench of Justice Manish Pitale was hearing a petition filed by Arunkumar Singh, whose younger son was said to be sitting in the back seat of the Porsche car and was allegedly drunk. The child who was driving the car was allegedly drunk when the Porsche crashed into the bicycle, resulting in the death of two people.
The allegations against Singh are that he changed the blood sample of his youngest son together with the doctors and staff of the government-run Sassoon hospital with the blood sample of his co-accused Ashish Mittal, which was sent for testing to confirm that he is negative. because it’s alcohol.
According to the investigating agencies, Singh escaped when the police got information about the blood exchange issue.
Singh’s counsel argued that Sections 464 (forgery) and 467 (forgery of valuable securities) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) cannot be invoked against him in the given facts and circumstances of the case.
On the other hand, Special Public Prosecutor Shishir Hiray, from the Pune police, submitted that the exchange of blood samples by the accused led to the Alcohol Examination Certificate (AEC) prepared by the Assistant Chemical Analyzer turning out to be a false document. Further, it was emphasized that Singh’s role cannot be separated from the other accused who played a major role in the fraud.
Advocate Aabad Ponda, who represented Singh, submitted that the blood sample cannot be said to be a document, and it cannot be concluded that there is any forgery in this case.
Opposing that, Prosecutor Hiray insisted that Singh’s custody is necessary to end the conspiracy formed with the accused, including the amount of money bribed by their doctors.
The bench noted that the entire process of exchanging blood samples was done on Singh’s orders, to create a letter that would ensure his younger son’s release. The bench said that all the others, including the doctors, were arrested, which is why the issue of these two categories must be looked into.
The bench said that Section 464 required that the document in question was obtained by deceiving a person because he did not get information about the nature of the conversion.
However, the bench observed that deception was committed by the defendant when the suspect’s blood sample was labeled as a child’s blood sample.
“The petitioner, who is the father of a minor son, was a party to the conspiracy under Section 120-B of the IPC for forgery by affixing a label showing the blood of the minor son while the blood sample of co-accused Ashish Mittal It is the said label affixed to the blood sample which was the basis of the forgery, read and the documents created by the conspiracy and the co-accused Dr. Halnor that the blood sample is not a document, it becomes useless,” Justice Pitale commented.
On May 19 at around 2.30 am in Pune area, Kalyani Nagar, a young man, allegedly under the influence of alcohol, drove a Porsche car and went on a two-wheeler, killing two computer engineers.
Source link